Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

advertise with us
Sponsored by
Read more about on-line and in print,
advertising or call 0 1653 600 051 now.
 
 
Tuesday, 6th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Malton & Pickering Mercury site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council backs mini-dams plan



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 November 2008
PICKERING'S civic leaders are throwing their weight behind a new report which suggests ways the town can be protected from flooding.
The study by a team of scientists and local residents found that dredging the town’s beck and clearing overgrown vegetation from the banksides would ease the flow of water and a system of mini-dams to temporarily store water upstream would reduce the
risk of flooding by controlling the flow.

Ryedale Flood Research Group, which included experts from Durham, Oxford and East Anglia Universities, spent a year looking at the problem and tapping local knowledge.

Its findings were unveiled at a public exhibition in the town four weeks ago.

Now, after visiting the display and reading the report, town councillors have given it their full support.

They plan to make sure the Environment Agency, the Minister of State for local Government and Communities, John Healey, and Rosie Winterton, the Minister with responsibility for Yorkshire and the Humber, together with Shadow Floods Minister Anne McIntosh, are all aware of its contents.

The council will also draw it to the attention of the local drainage boards at their meeting next month and ask Pickering Flood Defence Group to invite a councillor to its next meeting to discuss the way forward.

Cllr Julie Hepworth told the council’s meeting on Monday she was “really pleased” with the findings.

She said: “The Environment Agency has said all along that getting the sediment out of the bottom of the beck wouldn’t make a difference so I’m really pleased to see this report has come out and said it would.

“I’ve talked to people who have told me they used to dive into six feet of water at The Rookers 20 years ago. They couldn’t do it now.”

And she added: “If they get the sediment out and these mini-dams upstream, I’m all for it.”

Cllr Natalie Warriner, who represents Ryedale on the Local Government Flood Forum, said the local drainage boards had been proved right about dredging.

She said: “They’ve been saying this for years and years and years and no-one has taken an iota of notice of them. Let’s hope this report makes people start to listen.

“But we need the co-operation of our neighbours in the National Park to get these mini dams. They wouldn’t play ball last time it was suggested.”

The council agreed to support and promote the report and its findings in every way it can. It will also put a summary of the conclusions on its website.

l What do you think?

Email: sheila.elgey@yrnltd.co.uk

Write to: Malton and Pickering Mercury, 49 Market Place, Malton YO17 7LX

Text us: Start any comments with MPMEDITOR and text us your message with your name and address to 81800. (25p charge plus your normal network rate. See terms in Public Notices)



The full article contains 490 words and appears in Malton & Pickering Mercury newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 November 2008 1:18 PM
  • Source: Malton & Pickering Mercury
  • Location: Malton
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

DOES Kirkbymoorside have the infrastructure and services to cope with 170 new homes?
Yes
No
Don't Know

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.